<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>YPM, Inc.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ypm.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ypm.com</link>
	<description>National Yellow Pages &#124; Digital Media Agency</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 23:14:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>When the Sum is Greater than the Equal of Its Parts</title>
		<link>http://www.ypm.com/when-the-sum-is-greater-than-the-equal-of-its-parts?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=when-the-sum-is-greater-than-the-equal-of-its-parts</link>
		<comments>http://www.ypm.com/when-the-sum-is-greater-than-the-equal-of-its-parts#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 23:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>YPM Digital</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YPM Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ypm.com/?p=2295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As part of YPM’s annual Kick Off meeting, the entire company convenes to join forces with skill, strategy and precision, working towards an ultimate goal…much like the daily commitment of the YPM team itself. <a href="http://www.ypm.com/?p=2295"> Read More</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="page_w">
<p>As part of YPM’s annual Kick Off meeting, the entire company convenes to join forces with skill, strategy and precision, working towards an ultimate goal…much like the daily commitment of the YPM team itself. </p>
<p>With a singular focus on performance, crews are formed and the race to the Finish Line begins.  The task: working in unison, bring together pieces which by themselves do little, but structured properly may be a winning formula for success. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.ypm.com/when-the-sum-is-greater-than-the-equal-of-its-parts/blog_kickoff_01/" rel="attachment wp-att-2296"><img src="http://www.ypm.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/blog_kickoff_01.jpg" alt="" width="311" height="214" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2296" /></a></p>
<p>Each team has the same parts, the same restrictions and the same opportunity to build for its success on the track. So why would it seem that one would outperform another? All the pieces are the same, the track is the same and there would be no apparent advantage of one over the other, right? </p>
<p>There is no guarantee of making it down the track much less crossing the Finish Line in this race. For it is not in the pieces themselves which are awarded in this race, but rather how the pieces are constructed, how they fit together and how working in concert with one another, they achieve one goal…together. Make no mistake there is plenty of trial and error, test runs, and going back to the drawing board to calculate the odds of success against the competition.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ypm.com/when-the-sum-is-greater-than-the-equal-of-its-parts/blog_kickoff_02/" rel="attachment wp-att-2297"><img src="http://www.ypm.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/blog_kickoff_02.jpg" alt="" width="291" height="219" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2297" /></a></p>
<p>Whether it is brand building, team building, or even Tinker Toy car racing the same rings true, one strategy, one person, one piece, will have limited success by itself. A singular media channel will capture only one audience, a single person can only do so much and a lone wheel will propel the car only so far. For it is only through strategic coordination, careful planning and results measurement that true synergies are realized for the ultimate winning combination. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.ypm.com/when-the-sum-is-greater-than-the-equal-of-its-parts/blog_kickoff_03/" rel="attachment wp-att-2298"><img src="http://www.ypm.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/blog_kickoff_03.jpg" alt="" width="311" height="249" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2298" /></a>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ypm.com/when-the-sum-is-greater-than-the-equal-of-its-parts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Search + Social…Just a Matter of Time</title>
		<link>http://www.ypm.com/search-social-just-a-matter-of-time?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=search-social-just-a-matter-of-time</link>
		<comments>http://www.ypm.com/search-social-just-a-matter-of-time#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>YPM Digital</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YPM Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ypm.com/?p=2284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It’s been clear for some time that Google’s greatest rival was never going to be Yahoo, Bing or the combination thereof. Instead, the explosion of consumer generated content where the user IS the product is the greatest threat to even a behemoth such as Google. Enter Facebook. <a href="http://www.ypm.com/?p=2284">Read More</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="page_w">
<p>It’s been clear for some time that Google’s greatest rival was never going to be Yahoo, Bing or the combination thereof. Instead, the explosion of consumer generated content where the user IS the product is the greatest threat to even a behemoth such as Google. Enter Facebook. </p>
<p>Google’s social facelift from Buzz to Google+ in June 2011 was its latest attempt at getting social right in the hopes of turning billions of searches into a social network, thus locking users onto Google instead of straying elsewhere.</p>
<p>In fact, Google has been trying to get ‘personal’ since June 2005 when based on personal behavior and interests, results would be given a boost. By February 2007, personalized results were expanded and repackaged and by December 2009 by default, Google would show you personalized results whether you opted in or were signed in, or not. Social search results entered onto the scene in October 2009 which were not only personalized but were based on people you know, rather than the searcher’s own behavior.</p>
<p>Google’s integration of social and regular search results came February 2011. It expanded to include not just content created by those you know but also content shared by them through a variety of social networks.</p>
<p>Henceforth, the intersection of private, public, personal and social was born…</p>
<p>While Google+ is still in its infancy, it’s wasting no time being integrated with other Google experiences. In January 2012, <i><a rel="nofollow" href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2012/01/search-plus-your-world.html" target="_blank">Search plus Your World</a></i> emerged, which finds both content that’s been shared with you privately along with matches from the public web, all mixed into a single set of listings. You’ll know it when you see it as a Google will alert you with a message like this above your search results:</p>
<div class="fancy-box gradient-box"><p>
<div style="text-align:center; margin-top:-14px; margin-bottom:-18px;"><img src="http://www.ypm.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/search_social.jpg" alt="" title="search_social" width="426" height="78" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-2285" /></div>
<p></p></div>
<p>While this convergence is underway there is no shortage of questions and user privacy concerns bubbling to the top not unlike those which surfaced surrounding the Facebook Timeline. Time will tell how this plays out. </p>
<p>In the meantime, the prominence Google is placing on Google+ and Search plus Your World is giving rise to a new way marketers must look at their Search + Social strategy. Here are a few ways to take advantage of the emerging space as excerpted from <a rel="nofollow" href="http://searchengineland.com/latest-google-search-revamp-brings-opportunities-for-local-businesses-107886" target="_blank">Search Engine Land</a>:</p>
<div style="margin-left:15px;">
<div id="bull">•</div>
<div id="bulletbox">Create a <a rel="nofollow" href="http://cl.exct.net/?qs=379f41b53fd4801b6676f726a47c259708a2b9bf3dd49dd8838928d312523123" target="_blank">Google+ business page</a>. It&#8217;s simple, free, and a no-brainer.</div>
<div id="bull">•</div>
<div id="bulletbox">Incorporate your business&#8217;s Google+ page into its online presence &#8211; including its website, blog and other social media channels &#8211; as well as its advertising and offline materials.</div>
<div id="bull">•</div>
<div id="bulletbox">Similar to your business&#8217;s approach with other social media channels like Facebook and Twitter, encourage customers to follow your Google+ page for special announcements and deals.</div>
<div id="bull">•</div>
<div id="bulletbox">Update your business&#8217;s Google+ page constantly with new information, whether its links to articles relevant to your business or photos of new products, not only to keep your page relevant with customers but also to increase the number of keywords that users can search and reach you through. </div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ypm.com/search-social-just-a-matter-of-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Online Shoppers 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.ypm.com/online-shoppers-2011?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=online-shoppers-2011</link>
		<comments>http://www.ypm.com/online-shoppers-2011#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 00:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>YPM Digital</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Industry Data]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ypm.com/?p=2273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="page_w"><p>The Internet has emerged as a new marketplace and a primary medium for reaching and influencing consumers. Consumers are increasing the number of purchases they make directly through the Internet. Which consumers use the Internet to make online purchases? This paper reviews data from Simmons (Spring 2011) to identify the key demographic characteristics of those most likely to make purchases online.</p></div>

Download the article here - <a href='http://www.ypm.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Online-Shoppers-2011.pdf' target="_blank">Online Shoppers 2011</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="page_w">
<p>The Internet has emerged as a new marketplace and a primary medium for reaching and influencing consumers. Consumers are increasing the number of purchases they make directly through the Internet. Which consumers use the Internet to make online purchases? This paper reviews data from Simmons (Spring 2011) to identify the key demographic characteristics of those most likely to make purchases online.</p>
</div>
<p>Download the article here &#8211; <a href='http://www.ypm.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Online-Shoppers-2011.pdf' target="_blank">Online Shoppers 2011</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ypm.com/online-shoppers-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reviews: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly</title>
		<link>http://www.ypm.com/reviews-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=reviews-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly</link>
		<comments>http://www.ypm.com/reviews-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 00:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>YPM Digital</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YPM Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ypm.com/?p=2215</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Consumer generated content has long since been a digital Pandora’s Box, the veritable soap box for testimonials, reviews, customer service outreach and even rants. When the message is positive and supportive, good news can travel fast, when it’s negative, bad news will travel even faster. <a href="http://www.ypm.com/?p=2215">Read More</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="page_w">
<p>Consumer generated content has long since been a digital Pandora’s Box, the veritable soap box for testimonials, reviews, customer service outreach and even rants. When the message is positive and supportive, good news can travel fast, when it’s negative, bad news will travel even faster. </p>
<p>And while brand transparency is good for consumerism, how does a century old company who painstakingly has built its reputation with one to one personal connections insulate itself from the potential single unsatisfied customer from tarnishing its good name online? </p>
<p>First, a reality check – every single business has had more than one unsatisfied customer. Period. Consumers by and large recognize that no company—large or small, public or private—can satisfy everyone, all of the time. The difference however lies between reality and what a potential customer perceives, and reads.</p>
<p>Review websites such as Yelp, CityGrid, Insider Pages and Merchant Circle, as well as the growing list of service directories which compile consumer ratings of local service companies such as Consumer Reports and Angie’s List, all thrive on peer to peer referrals and reviews.  </p>
<p><i>&#8220;<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/158280/" target="_blank">New Cone research</a> reveals 80% consumers have changed their minds about purchasing a recommended product or service based solely on negative information they found online. This is up from just 67% of consumers who said the same in 2010. Online information, a trustworthy source for 89% of consumers, has the power to make or break a product recommendation, concludes the report.</i></p>
<p><i>Positive information has a similar effect on decision making, with 87% of consumers agreeing a favorable review has confirmed their decision to purchase. But, negative information is gaining traction and is now just as powerful in tipping the scales against a recommended purchase.”</i></p>
<p>While most brands have attended to the business of promoting themselves online, many are left exposed and unaware of what is being said about them across review websites, blogs and throughout social networks. With 64% of consumers seeking out user reviews before deciding to purchase, knowing the sentiment about a brand is vital, remember what they say about one bad apple. </p>
<table>
<tr>
<td><b>Before Deciding To Purchase</b> (% of Respondents)</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><b><i>Go Online To:</i></b></td>
<td><b><i>2010</i></b></td>
<td><b><i>2011</i></b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Research product/service information</td>
<td>61%</td>
<td>69%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Search for consumer or user reviews</td>
<td>55</td>
<td>64</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Search for the product/service on ratings websites<br />
(e.g., Consumer Reports, Angie&#8217;s List, Yelp!)
</td>
<td>43</td>
<td>50</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Search for opinions from product/service experts</td>
<td>38</td>
<td>43</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Read articles or blog posts about the product/service</td>
<td>28</td>
<td>42</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Solicit opinions from their social network(s)</td>
<td>10</td>
<td>12</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><i>Source: Cone Trend Tracker, August 2011</i></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>If the best defense is a good offense, here are a few ways to get in the game:</p>
<div style="margin-left:15px;">
<div id="bull">1. </div>
<div id="bulletbox">Embrace the fact consumer generated digital content is here to stay, in one form or another.</div>
<div id="bull">2. </div>
<div id="bulletbox">Monitor what is being said about your company through tools such as <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.google.com/alerts" target="_blank">Google Alerts</a> or <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.socialmention.com/" target="_blank">Social Mention</a>.</div>
<div id="bull">3. </div>
<div id="bulletbox">Secure your brand name across social media networks.</div>
<div id="bull">4. </div>
<div id="bulletbox">Invite your customers to provide you feedback. When a customer raves about your service enlist them to write a review on Google Places, Yelp, CityGrid, etc. Never fake reviews!</div>
<div id="bull">5. </div>
<div id="bulletbox">Respond to customer reviews. If positive, thank them for the review and possibly offer an incentive to return (coupon, discount code, etc.). If negative reach out to them privately in a timely manner. Ask what you could have done or could still do to make their experience more positive. </div>
<div id="bull">6. </div>
<div id="bulletbox">Actively syndicate positive content about your company across channels.</div>
</div>
<p>Finally, give outrageously great customer service, in the end isn’t that what this is all about?  </p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ypm.com/reviews-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Telmetrics Introduces Call Tracking Without Tracking Numbers</title>
		<link>http://www.ypm.com/telmetrics-introduces-call-tracking-without-tracking-numbers?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=telmetrics-introduces-call-tracking-without-tracking-numbers</link>
		<comments>http://www.ypm.com/telmetrics-introduces-call-tracking-without-tracking-numbers#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 22:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>YPM Digital</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ypm.com/?p=2208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Call tracking has long been criticized by Local SEOs and others as violating the sanctity of what Localeze’s Gib Olander has called the “NAP” (name, address and phone number) — the central currency of all local business listings. The concern was and is that the rented tracking numbers (metered phone numbers) would be crawled or ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Call tracking has <a rel="nofollow" href="http://searchengineland.com/be-wary-of-call-tracking-numbers-in-local-search-26895" target="_blank">long been criticized</a> by Local SEOs and others as violating the sanctity of what Localeze’s Gib Olander has called the “NAP” (name, address and phone number) — the central currency of all local business listings. The concern was and is that the rented tracking numbers (metered phone numbers) would be crawled or otherwise distributed out across the internet and pollute the key listings data.</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://searchengineland.com/telmetrics-introduces-call-tracking-without-tracking-numbers-93450" target="_blank">Read More&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ypm.com/telmetrics-introduces-call-tracking-without-tracking-numbers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Enables Call Tracking From Mobile Landing Pages</title>
		<link>http://www.ypm.com/google-enables-call-tracking-from-mobile-landing-pages?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=google-enables-call-tracking-from-mobile-landing-pages</link>
		<comments>http://www.ypm.com/google-enables-call-tracking-from-mobile-landing-pages#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 22:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>YPM Digital</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ypm.com/?p=2204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google’s Click to Call program has been a huge success. About a year ago Google reported that it had 500,000 advertisers using Click to Call. (That number was repeated again today in a blog post.) And last year former Google Product SVP Jonathan Rosenberg said “Click-to-Call ads are generating millions of calls every month.” Read ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google’s Click to Call program has been a huge success. About a year ago Google reported that it had 500,000 advertisers using Click to Call. (That number was repeated again today in a blog post.) And last year former Google Product SVP Jonathan Rosenberg said “Click-to-Call ads are generating millions of calls every month.” </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://searchengineland.com/google-enables-call-tracking-from-mobile-landing-pages-95932" target="_blank">Read More&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ypm.com/google-enables-call-tracking-from-mobile-landing-pages/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Tweaks AdWords To Give Landing Page Quality More Weight</title>
		<link>http://www.ypm.com/google-tweaks-adwords-to-give-landing-page-quality-more-weight?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=google-tweaks-adwords-to-give-landing-page-quality-more-weight</link>
		<comments>http://www.ypm.com/google-tweaks-adwords-to-give-landing-page-quality-more-weight#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 22:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>YPM Digital</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ypm.com/?p=2191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After quietly testing in Brazil, Spanish-speaking Latin America, Spain, and Portugal, Google will roll out a new algorithm globally that gives more weight to landing page quality when it comes to AdWords Quality Score. This means ads with landing pages that Google deems to be most relevant to the query will be able to rank ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After quietly testing in Brazil, Spanish-speaking Latin America, Spain, and Portugal, Google will roll out a new algorithm globally that gives more weight to landing page quality when it comes to AdWords Quality Score. This means ads with landing pages that Google deems to be most relevant to the query will be able to rank higher for lower cost-per-click bids.</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://searchengineland.com/google-tweaks-adwords-to-give-landing-page-quality-more-weight-95488" target="_blank">Read More&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ypm.com/google-tweaks-adwords-to-give-landing-page-quality-more-weight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Analytics Premium: Better Support &amp; Goodbye Data Sampling</title>
		<link>http://www.ypm.com/google-analytics-premium-better-support-goodbye-data-sampling?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=google-analytics-premium-better-support-goodbye-data-sampling</link>
		<comments>http://www.ypm.com/google-analytics-premium-better-support-goodbye-data-sampling#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 22:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>YPM Digital</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ypm.com/?p=2187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today Google launched a paid version of Google Analytics that processes higher volumes of page views and provides additional support. The general feature set and user experience remain the fundamentally the same as the standard product. This comes as an important addition to the enterprise set of tools that Google offers. The new version audience ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="page_w">
<p>Today Google launched a paid version of Google Analytics that processes higher volumes of page views and provides additional support. The general feature set and user experience remain the fundamentally the same as the standard product. This comes as an important addition to the enterprise set of tools that Google offers. The new version audience is mainly enterprises that receive a high amount of traffic and need a certain commitment from Google’s part on data collection, up-time, and support.</p>
</div>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://searchengineland.com/google-analytics-premium-better-support-goodbye-data-sampling-94997" target="_blank">Read More&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ypm.com/google-analytics-premium-better-support-goodbye-data-sampling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>comScore Reports August 2011 U.S. Mobile Subscriber Market Share</title>
		<link>http://www.ypm.com/comscore-reports-august-2011-u-s-mobile-subscriber-market-share?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=comscore-reports-august-2011-u-s-mobile-subscriber-market-share</link>
		<comments>http://www.ypm.com/comscore-reports-august-2011-u-s-mobile-subscriber-market-share#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 22:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>YPM Digital</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ypm.com/?p=2181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RESTON, VA, October 5, 2011 – comScore, Inc. (NASDAQ: SCOR), a leader in measuring the digital world, today released data from the comScore MobiLens service, reporting key trends in the U.S. mobile phone industry during the three month average period ending August 2011. The study surveyed more than 30,000 U.S. mobile subscribers and found Samsung ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RESTON, VA, October 5, 2011 – comScore, Inc. (NASDAQ: SCOR), a leader in measuring the digital world, today released data from the comScore MobiLens service, reporting key trends in the U.S. mobile phone industry during the three month average period ending August 2011. The study surveyed more than 30,000 U.S. mobile subscribers and found Samsung to be the top handset manufacturer overall with 25.3 percent market share. Google Android continued to gain ground in the smartphone market reaching 43.7 percent market share.</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.comscore.com/Press_Events/Press_Releases/2011/10/comScore_Reports_August_2011_U.S._Mobile_Subscriber_Market_Share" target="_blank">Read More&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ypm.com/comscore-reports-august-2011-u-s-mobile-subscriber-market-share/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Not All Leads are Created the Same</title>
		<link>http://www.ypm.com/not-all-leads-are-created-the-same?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=not-all-leads-are-created-the-same</link>
		<comments>http://www.ypm.com/not-all-leads-are-created-the-same#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 22:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>YPM Digital</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Industry Data]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ypm.com/?p=2174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="page_w"><p>“Not all leads are created equal. To illustrate this point, which lead generation program is more appealing? Would you prefer 1,000 anonymous email addresses where you eventually determine only ten to be good prospects? Or would you like one that delivers 100 leads, each of whom is an ideal prospect?” As the quote above suggests, leads from the second source (the one that delivers 100 ideal prospects) would be worth 100 times more than leads from the first source (the one whose leads had only a 1% chance of being a good prospect). If a business is willing to pay $1 per lead for the first source, then they should be willing to pay $100 per lead for the second.</p><div>

Download the article here - <a href='http://www.ypm.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Not-All-Leads-are-Created-Equal-2011.pdf' target="_blank">Not All Leads are Created the Same</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="page_w">
<p>“Not all leads are created equal. To illustrate this point, which lead generation program is more appealing? Would you prefer 1,000 anonymous email addresses where you eventually determine only ten to be good prospects? Or would you like one that delivers 100 leads, each of whom is an ideal prospect?” As the quote above suggests, leads from the second source (the one that delivers 100 ideal prospects) would be worth 100 times more than leads from the first source (the one whose leads had only a 1% chance of being a good prospect). If a business is willing to pay $1 per lead for the first source, then they should be willing to pay $100 per lead for the second.</p>
</div>
<p>Download the article here &#8211; <a href='http://www.ypm.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Not-All-Leads-are-Created-Equal-2011.pdf' target="_blank">Not All Leads are Created the Same</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ypm.com/not-all-leads-are-created-the-same/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

